Optometry & Visual Performance 144 Volume 14 | Issue 2 | June 2026 spectacle use, and limited communication between schools and parents regarding vision care. Since parental involvement is crucial for successful screening programs, future efforts should focus on raising awareness, improving school-parent communication, and addressing cultural misconceptions to enhance participation and referral compliance. Conclusion This study identified various challenges affecting the effectiveness of the SBVS in Egor Local Government Area, Benin City, Nigeria, mirroring similar issues found in other contexts. It highlights critical gaps in the provision of vision screening programs, including low prevalence, resource constraints, and lack of awareness. At the same time, it emphasizes the significant potential benefits of such programs and provides actionable recommendations to address the barriers identified. The findings emphasize the importance of targeted strategies to increase awareness, allocate resources effectively, and engage key stakeholders in ensuring that vision screening becomes an integral part of school health initiatives. To address these challenges, recommendations include allocating adequate government resources to fund equipment, trained professionals, and materials; implementing staff training programs; fostering parental engagement; and establishing continuous monitoring and evaluation to improve the program’s impact and sustainability in enhancing students’ eye health outcomes. Ethics approval: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Department of Optometry, University of Benin, with the REC approval number EC/UBEN/LSC. OPT/23/78. All procedures performed in this study were conducted in accordance with the Tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for human subjects. References 1. World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments. Geneva: WHO; 2010. 2. Antonio-Aguirre B, Ambrosino CM, Dai X, Collins ME. Addressing health disparities in pediatric eye care for school-age children: A call to action. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023;12(11):17. doi:10.1167/tvst.12.11.17. 3. Mattey B, Zein WM, O’Malley D, Naron C. Preventing vision loss among students through eye safety and early detection. NASN Sch Nurse 2013;28(5):233-6. 4. Sharma A, Congdon N, Patel M, Gilbert C. School-based approaches to the correction of refractive error in children. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57(3):272-83. 5. Andersen T, Jeremiah M, Thamane K, et al. Implementing a school vision screening program in Botswana using smartphone technology. Telemed J E Health 2020;26(2):2558. 6. Engels T, Trotignon G, Agyemang D, et al. Cost and budget impact analysis of a school-based vision screening program in Cambodia and Ghana: Implications for policy and program scale-up. Health Policy Open 2021;2:100043. doi: 10.1016/j. hpopen.2021.100043. 7. Collins ME, Guo X, Repka MX, Neitzel AJ, Friedman DS. Lessons learned from school-based delivery of vision care in Baltimore, Maryland. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2022;11(1):6-11. 8. Sathyan S. Vision screening at schools: Strategies and challenges. Kerala J Ophthalmol 2017;29(2):121-30. 9. Osian EA, Igbinomoba O, Olorunfemi O, Agbonkpolor MU. Operations of the school health program assessment at selected secondary schools in Egor Local Government Area, Benin City, Nigeria. J Integr Nurs 2021;3(2):56-61. 10. Jrbashyan N, Yeghiazaryan N, Sikder A, et al. Pattern and prevalence of eye disorders and diseases in school-aged children: Findings from the nationwide school sight sampling survey in Armenia. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2022;7(1):e000899. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000899. 11. Modest JR, Majzoub KM, Moore B, et al. Implementation of instrument-based vision screening for preschool-age children in primary care. Pediatrics 2017;140(1):e20163740. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3740. 12. Ali Q, Heldal I, Helgesen CG, et al. Current challenges supporting school-aged children with vision problems: A rapid review. Appl Sci 2021;11(20):9673. doi: org/10.3390/ app11209673 13. Haalboom R. A qualitative description of stakeholder perceptions of factors influencing implementation of schoolbased vision screening in Ontario [dissertation]. University of Toronto; 2020. 14. Robinson B, Bobier WR, Martin E, Bryant L. Measurement of the validity of a preschool vision screening program. Am J Public Health 1999;89(2):193-8. doi:10.2105/ajph.89.2.193. 15. Adzaho CS, Appiah-Brempong E, Acheampong PR, Ekutor E. Availability of eye health interventions in basic schools in a Ghanaian municipality. Front Public Health 2024;12:1468285. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1468285. 16. Wang P, Bianchet S, Carter M, Hopman W, Law C. Utilization and barriers to eye care following school-wide pediatric vision screening. Can J Ophthalmol 2023;58(5):465-71. 17. Toledo CC, Paiva AP, Camilo GB, Maior MR, Leite IC, Guerra MR. Early detection of visual impairment and its relation with school effectiveness. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010;56(4):415-9. 18. Burnett AM, Yashadhana A, Lee L, et al. Interventions to improve school-based eye-care services in low- and middleincome countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Correspondence regarding this article should be emailed to Daniel Ayodele Femi, OD at daniel.femi@lifesci.uniben.edu. All statements are the authors' personal opinions and may not reflect the opinions OEPF, OVP , or any institution or organization with which the authors may be affiliated. Permission to use reprints of this article must be obtained from the editor. Copyright 2026 OEPF. Femi DA, Ifeanyi OC. Investigating thefactors that hinder school-based vision screening programs at Egor Local Government Area, Benin City, Nigeria. Optom Vis Perf 2026;14(2):139-144.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjEyMDQ0Nw==